What is a counterfeit crime?
In any case, before studying each type, there are a series of common provisions that affect all types of counterfeits. Thus, preparatory acts for counterfeiting currency and documentary counterfeiting are punishable. The manufacture, receipt, obtaining or possession of tools, materials, instruments, substances, data and software, apparatus, security features or other means specially intended for the commission of the offence of counterfeiting is punishable.
The use of authentic documents by those who are not authorised to do so is also punishable. Thus, for example, it is prohibited to use authentic documents, certificates, ID cards, passports, registration plates, etc. when they are not used by their holder.
Counterfeit and forgery lawyers
1. Counterfeiting of currency and stamps
What are the penalties for counterfeiting currency?
– Whoever alters or manufactures counterfeit currency.
– Whoever brings into the country or exports counterfeit or altered currency.
– Whoever transports, sells or distributes counterfeit or altered currency.
– If the currency is put into circulation, the upper half of the penalty shall be imposed.
What are the penalties for possession of counterfeit currency?
In this respect, it is essential to point out that it must be the prosecution who proves that at the time of putting the received banknote into circulation, the subject knew that it was counterfeit. This is a difficult circumstance to prove.
What are the penalties for counterfeiting stamps or stamped goods?
The purchaser of stamps who knows that they are counterfeit and distributes or uses them in a quantity of more than 400 euros, will be punished with a prison sentence of 3 to 6 months.
Exception: If the amount is less than 400 euros, a fine of 1 to 3 months is imposed.
2. Forgery of documents
Types of forgery
– Material forgery: This affects the authenticity of the document, and is a forgery in which either the document has been altered or it is a partial or total simulation of the document. For example, a person who falsifies a medical certificate.
-Ideological forgery: This affects the veracity of the document, and involves forgery in which the document is authentic, but does not reflect reality. For example, a notary attesting to the intervention of persons who have not been involved in the document.
Forgery of public, official and commercial documents by a civil servant
It must be during his activity as a civil servant. If the official commits the forgery in his private sphere, this rule does not apply.
There are cases that have raised doubts and finally the Courts have decided to declare that they do not constitute an offence:
– Signature in blank: the conduct of a person who consents to sign in blank does not constitute this type of forgery.
– Signing with the name of another but with their consent: in this sense, it makes no difference whether or not there has been an imitation of the real signature.
There are other doubtful cases in which, a priori, case law has repeatedly pointed to the existence of forgery:
– Attributing false statements or declarations to participants in a meeting or act, provided that these affect the function of the document. In other words, anecdotal or irrelevant statements are not forgeries.
– Ideological forgeries provided that they refer to facts, not to legal evaluations, since the latter are not susceptible to a judgement of veracity.
Forgery of public, official and commercial documents by private individuals
With regard to the preparation of false invoices, there are two lines of interpretation:
– On the one hand, the Courts that affirm that by falsifying an invoice there is a total simulation of the document in order to mislead about its authenticity and therefore entails a lack of correspondence with reality. In short, the conduct is punishable under Art. 3188.8.131.52.
– On the other hand, those who point out that the invoice is authentic because it was recognised by the person signing it and what exists is a lack of truth in the narration of the facts, so that the conduct is unpunishable under Art. 390.1.4.
-The cases that already have a unanimous solution are those in which the forgery affects the signature of the private individual. If the private individual disfigures his own signature, the essential elements of forgery are missing, because neither the veracity nor the legitimacy is altered.
– Another case that has also been resolved is where a private individual leads a third party, e.g. a notary, to believe that the person appearing before him is another person. In such cases, we are talking about forgery i.e. by using a public official as a mere means.
Trafficking in and use of false identity documents
Those who merely use the forged identity documents will be sentenced to 3 months to 1 year imprisonment.
Identity documents also include passports and driving licences. More doubtful cases are foreign identity documents and international permits.
Forgery of private documents
Forgery is understood as:
– Alteration of a document in any of its essential elements or requirements.
– Simulation of a document in whole or in part, in such a way as to mislead as to its authenticity.
– Assumption in an act of the intervention of persons who have not been involved.
Similarly, those who merely use the document will be subject to a lesser penalty.
Forgery of certificates
– Forged certificate by a medical practitioner: this would be the case of health professionals such as doctors. The penalties are 3 to 12 months imprisonment.
– Forgery of a certificate by a public official: in this case, from 6 months to 2 years imprisonment.
– Forgery of a certificate by private individuals: this would be the case e.g. of the president of a housing cooperative. Penalties of 3 to 6 months fine.
Counterfeiting of credit cards, debit cards or travellers' cheques
Anyone who alters, copies or reproduces these means of payment is punished. A common example is card cloning, counterfeiting, fraud, hacking, swiping, skimming or any other way to commit the crime. The penalties are 4 to 8 years imprisonment.
The penalties are aggravated in cases where they affect a multitude of persons or are committed within a criminal organisation.
In these cases, the most important thing is to identify the movements of the bank accounts in order to locate the defrauded funds.
3. Identity theft
It is only punishable in cases where it has been committed with the intention of benefiting from it and a real third party has been impersonated. The cases of impersonation of a non-existent third party are not punishable, e.g. when a fabricated name and surname are given when contracting a telephone promotion.
This article also punishes those who impersonate on the Internet, a phenomenon known as “identity theft”.
It is punishable by imprisonment from 6 months to 3 years.
4. Labour Intrusion
The penalty is a fine of 12 to 24 months.
For example, the following would fall under this heading: real estate agent or administrative manager.
In this case, it is punishable by 6 to 12 months imprisonment.